Skip to main content

Avant Browser - Stored Cross Site Scripting - Feed Reader (browser://localhost/lst?*)


Details

Vendor Site: Avant browser (www.avantbrowser.com)
Date: December, 5 2012 – CVE (TBA)
Affected Software: Avant Browser Ultimate 2012 Build 28 and potentially previous versions
Status: Unpatched
Researcher: Roberto Suggi Liverani - @malerisch
PDF version: Avant_multiple_vulnerabilities_advisory.pdf


Stored Cross Site Scripting - Feed Reader (browser://localhost/lst?*)

A malicious user can inject and store arbitrary JavaScript/HTML code via multiple RSS feed elements. Vulnerable elements are the following:
  • <title> element: JavaScript injection using HTML encoded payload
  • <link> element: JavaScript injection using javascript: pseudouri ( this is rendered in about:blank zone.)
  • <description> element: JavaScript injection using HTML encoded payload
The following table shows an example of malicious RSS feed:

<?xml version='1.0' encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<description>Malerisch.net</description>
<link>http://blog.malerisch.net/</link>
<title>Malerisch.net</title>
<item>
    <title>browser security&gt;&lt;img src=a onerror='alert(1);' ;&gt;</title>
    <link>javascript:alert(window.location);</link>
    <description>07/09/2008 - I have done some research in the area of browser security and presented this argument at the last OWASP NZ meeting.&lt;img src=a onerror='alert(2);';&gt;
    </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

Injection is possible in a single case: user views a malicious feed using Avant Feed Reader built-in component.

The Feed Reader is located at feed:// URI scheme (e.g. feed://localhost/browser/avent/rss.xml) Note that the URL of the feed has to be subscribed to be rendered under the feed: uri. Also, the feed:// uri scheme is mapped to browser://localhost/lst?domain.name/path/to/rss.feed.


Exploitation

This vulnerability can be defined as a traditional Stored Cross Site Scripting vulnerability. Although, the injection is rendered within an internal browser zone (mapped to browser://localhost/lst?domain.name/path/to/rss.feed  ), invocation of privileged commands appears to not be possible as SOP is correctly applied to the browser:// zone.

Video

Avant Browser - Stored Cross Site Scripting - Feed Reader (browser://localhost/lst?*)


Timeline

07/03/2012 - Posted 10 posts to a forum to get a security contact
14/03/2012 - Reception of report confirmed but no further reply
14/03/2012 - Chased them, no reply
03-05/2012 - 2 new releases following the report, one bug silently fixed
12/05/2012 - HITB2012AMS - bug disclosed during presentation
14/11/2012 - HackPra - bug and exploit module presented

Solution

Do not use Avant browser.

Popular posts from this blog

Pwning a thin client in less than two minutes

Have you ever encountered a zero client or a thin client? It looks something like this...

If yes, keep reading below, if not, then if you encounter one, you know what you can do if you read below...

The model above is a T520, produced by HP - this model and other similar models are typically employed to support a medium/large VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) enterprise.

These clients run a Linux-based HP ThinPro OS by default and I had a chance to play with image version T6X44017 in particular, which is fun to play with it, since you can get a root shell in a very short time without knowing any password...

Normally, HP ThinPro OS interface is configured in a kiosk mode, as the concept of a thin/zero client is based on using a thick client to connect to another resource. For this purpose, a standard user does not need to authenticate to the thin client per se and would just need to perform a connection - e.g. VMware Horizon View. The user will eventually authenticate through the c…

UXSS in McAfee Endpoint Security, www.mcafee.com and some extra goodies...

During the HITB2017AMS talk given in Amsterdam with @Steventseeley, I promised that I would have disclosed vulnerabilities affecting a security vendor product other than Trend Micro.

For those who have come to my blog for the first time and are looking at "insecurities" of security vendors, you might be interested as well on how we found 200+ remote code execution vulnerabilities in Trend Micro software...

But this blog post is dedicated to two McAfee products instead: McAfee Endpoint Security and SiteAdvisor Enterprise (now part of McAfee Endpoint Security). For simplicity, I will just refer to McAfee Endpoint Security for the rest of this post.

First let's demonstrate a particular type of XSS, a UXSS, considering that fact that it only affects the McAfee Endpoint Security plugin and does not depend on a particular web site or web application.

There are two different injection points:

-UXSS when user visits a red labelled web site - the payload is rendered in the BlockP…

Alcatel Lucent Omnivista or: How I learned GIOP and gained Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2016-9796)

It is time for another advisory or better a blog post about Alcatel Lucent Omnivista and its vulnerabilities. Omnivista is a central management network tool and it is typically used in medium/large organisation with a complex VoIP/SIP infrastructure.



Interestingly enough, this software belongs to the niche of "undownloadable" software and it requires a license to work as well. My "luck" came during an engagement where it was already installed and this post documents one of the many 0days discovered during such audit.

The reasons why I wanted to dedicate a single blog post on this vulnerability are several.

First, remote code execution (RCE) is always a sweet bug to show. Second, I strongly believe that documenting vulnerabilities in applications using old protocols and standards, respectively GIOP and CORBA, can be beneficial for the infosec community, since no many examples of vulnerabilities in such applications are available or published on the Internet.

Actuall…